Prostatepedia

Conversations With Prostate Cancer Experts


Leave a comment

Join A Clinical Trial: Exercise + Advanced Prostate Cancer

S Kenfield_UCSFDr. Stacey Kenfield is an epidemiologist in the Urology Department at the University of California, SF who explores through her research how dietary and lifestyle factors impact both the risk of aggressive prostate cancer as well as the risk of prostate cancer progression. Prostatepedia spoke with her about her findings as well as a large clinical trial she’s directing with Movember that looks at the impact of exercise in men with advanced prostate cancer.

Not a member? Join us.

Why did you become an epidemiologist?

Dr. Stacey Kenfield: I’ve been an epidemiologist for over 12 years. The opportunity to help men with cancer improve their quality of life and survival with the disease continues to drive me to do the work that I do. Our group strives to translate our research findings and to implement clinical trials to learn how to help men adopt the behaviors that we study, as well as to learn more about the mechanisms driving the relationships.

We’ve continued to engage men with our clinical trials, but also now educate patients who visit our urology clinics and the community who want to know what they can do once they’ve been diagnosed with cancer. We’ve continued to do our research, believing that our results on lifestyle can be used as adjuvant therapy to primary treatment of prostate cancer, and can also help formulate tailored management tools to improve prostate cancer survivorship.

What do we know about the impact of diet on prostate cancer?

Dr. Kenfield: A number of studies indicate that specific dietary factors prior to diagnosis are associated with the risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer. We also know from studies performed in men with prostate cancer that many of these same factors are associated with the progression of disease and the risk of dying from prostate cancer. Some of these factors include cooked tomatoes, due to the fact that there’s more bioavailable lycopene in cooked tomatoes versus raw tomatoes.

We also know from studies that lycopene seems to inhibit prostate cancer growth and development of aggressive prostate cancer. Another factor is fish, which is possibly beneficial due to an anti-inflammatory effect. We’ve seen that fish with especially high levels of Omega-3 fatty acids, such as salmon, sardines, mackerel, and herring, are beneficial for reducing risk of the more aggressive forms of prostate cancer.

Another factor that we believe is important is to reduce one’s intake of processed meat. Processed meat has pre-formed compounds called N-nitroso compounds. It also has nitrites, nitrates, and added salt, which seem to have cancer-promoting properties.

There has also been a lot of research on dairy and calcium in prostate cancer. In general, most studies agree that higher intakes of calcium at levels of more than 1000 milligrams per day increase one’s risk of developing prostate cancer. We want to emphasize that men with or without prostate cancer need to consume some calcium for general health, just that it should not exceed 1000 milligrams per day. For example, a cup of skim milk has about 300 milligrams of calcium and a cup of yogurt about 450 milligrams. Getting some calcium from your diet is still incredibly important for overall health.

What about getting some of these nutrients in supplement form? I know lycopene and Omega-3 fatty acids are available as supplements. What do you get from the diet that you don’t get from supplements?

Dr. Kenfield: To be honest, a lot of our studies have been focused on whole foods.

I published a study back in 2015 on supplemental selenium intake showing that high doses of supplemental selenium are associated with about a 2.6-fold increased risk of prostate cancer mortality in men after diagnosis. Both the American Cancer Society, the American Institute for Cancer Research, and others discourage people from getting their nutrients from supplements, because the data do not suggest that it’s beneficial. In all likelihood, it could cause harm if you’re taking high dose supplements; so we recommend getting your nutrients from food if you can.

Are these all factors that you would recommend for both men who don’t have prostate cancer as well as those who have already been diagnosed?

Dr. Kenfield: There are a few factors that potentially impact prostate cancer progression that have been studied recently. Plant-based fat–like nuts, plant based oils, canola, olive oil, and avocados—have been studied after a diagnosis of prostate cancer and shown to have a beneficial impact on the risk of lethal prostate cancer. Another food that we’ve focused on is cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, cauliflower, and kale. These foods have components that detoxify carcinogens that could be helpful for stopping cancer cells from growing and can also cause cancer cell death.

I’ve already mentioned tomatoes, fish, and processed meat. We also recommend that men avoid high-fat dairy like whole milk, which has been linked to a higher risk of dying from prostate cancer.

What about red meat versus chicken?

Dr. Kenfield: We focus on recommending people eat lean protein sources, so this would be skinless poultry and fish, rather than red meat, which has been associated with other chronic diseases.

What about pork?

Dr. Kenfield: We have not been recommending pork specifically. We focus on just lean protein— chicken, fish, legumes, beans, and other sources of protein, like soy.

What about organic free-range meat? Do you have any comments about the importance of hormone-free meat?

Dr. Kenfield: This has not been studied. It’s a little bit harder to study organic or free-range meat in the types of data that we collect from our patients. That question is not regularly added to our food frequency questionnaires, so it hasn’t been looked at in detail.

What impact does exercise have on prostate cancer—both on the risk of getting prostate cancer and on the risk of progression once you’ve been diagnosed?

Dr. Kenfield: A number of studies have suggested that physical activity, especially activities done vigorously—i.e. cause sweating; deeper, quicker breathing; and cause your heart rate to increase—are associated with a reduced risk of lethal prostate cancer. Early studies from our group conducted in two independent cohorts of men with prostate cancer showed that vigorous activity of 3 or more hours a week in one study and brisk walking for 30 minutes or more on most days in the other study had substantial benefits on reducing one’s risk of dying of prostate cancer, or from progression from prostate cancer, respectively.

More recent studies suggest that slightly lower levels, about four hours of walking or two hours of jogging, had some benefit. There was a fourth study that showed that you may see a benefit after just one hour of exercise per week. Overall, the data suggest that exercise is beneficial, both for the prevention of advanced prostate cancer, as well as reducing one’s risk of progression from the disease. Any aerobic exercise seems to be better than none; there is some benefit. I think for prostate cancer, one should really strive to do some of that activity at a vigorous level.

You’re talking about cardiovascular exercise. What about resistance or strength training? Has anyone looked at that?

Dr. Kenfield: There have been a number of studies, mostly focused on men on hormone therapy (ADT), that show resistance exercise offers improvements in muscle strength and certain quality of life metrics. There have been trials that focused on both aerobic and resistance exercise; those studies have reported benefits, including gains in muscle strength, improved fitness, improved balance, and less fatigue. So both resistance training and cardiovascular training are helpful.

What about lifestyle factors like not smoking and stress management. How do those factors impact prostate cancer?

Dr. Kenfield: We’ve recently developed a lifestyle score to look at the combined risk of lifestyle factors on the development of lethal prostate cancer. In addition to the dietary factors that I just mentioned (high intake of tomatoes and fish and low intake of processed meat), we also looked at high levels of vigorous activity or brisk walking, not being obese (a body mass index or BMI<30), and not smoking. This included people who had never smoked or people who had quit ten or more years prior. We created a score, which has six factors. We found that men who had 5 or 6 of these healthy lifestyle factors versus 0 or 1 of the factors had a 68 lower risk of lethal prostate cancer. That is statistically significant. This was done in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (https://sites.sph.harvard.edu/hpfs/). In the same paper, we looked in the Physicians’ Health Study (http://phs. bwh.harvard.edu/phs1.htm). Many of the same variables are collected there, so we had a six-factor score and found a very similar reduction in the risk of lethal prostate cancer there. Most of the data used were collected before prostate cancer diagnosis, and up to the point of either having an outcome of lethal prostate cancer or to the end of the follow-up study. Currently, we’re looking at what lifestyle pattern after diagnosis offers the most benefit.

How are all these different lifestyle factors weighted? For example, is it more important not to smoke than to have an appropriate BMI?

Dr. Kenfield: In a separate publication on smoking, we reported that current smokers had a 61 percent increased risk of progression, which is PSA progression, as well as a 61 percent increased risk of death from prostate cancer. There is also a strong benefit for vigorous activity compared to some of the other dietary factors that have a more modest benefit. When we looked at each factor separately that are part of the score, vigorous activity had the greatest impact on prevention –we estimate that 34% of lethal prostate cancer would be prevented if men exercised vigorously regularly. I think focusing on not smoking and exercise would be critical for both prostate-specific outcomes as well as overall health and the main chronic diseases that men and women tend to die of, like heart disease.

Can you talk to us about the thinking behind the clinical trial that you’re running?

Dr. Kenfield: Some smaller clinical trials in men with prostate cancer, mostly at earlier stages of disease, have suggested that there are significant benefits to exercise on quality of life and functional outcomes. We also see from the observational research that there is an association between exercise and lower risk of clinical outcomes (I mentioned those findings above.) But we don’t know if exercise is beneficial in men with advanced prostate cancer. That was one of the critical reasons why Movember decided to fund INTERVAL (INTense Exercise foR surVivAL), a large global trial focused on advanced prostate cancer with the primary endpoint of overall mortality. We’re also interested in many secondary endpoints that need to be explored further, including exercise’s impact on progression-free survival, skeletal-related events, and other quality of life outcomes.

We really want to understand the mechanisms behind the associations, so we’re studying exercise’s effect on inflammation, insulin, glucose metabolism, androgen biosynthesis metabolism, and other pathways. We are collecting blood and urine in the study to look at mechanisms of exercise.

What can men expect to happen, step-by-step?

Dr. Kenfield: The trial is specifically examining whether a supervised exercise program versus a self-directed exercise program improves overall survival in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. If men are eligible, they will complete exercise tests at baseline. They’ll have their blood drawn, provide a urine sample, complete surveys, and then they’ll be randomized to either a one-year supervised aerobic and resistance exercise program that basically tapers over that year to another year of fully self-managed exercise, meaning exercise that you do on your own.

The other group is randomized to self-directed exercise. They will receive guidelines on how to do exercises on their own. During the two-year study, patients will complete exercise testing at various time points. We’ll ask them to complete surveys related to their lifestyle habits and quality of life. Each month, both groups will receive psychosocial support in the form of newsletters focused on different topics relevant to men with prostate cancer.

When you were describing the self-directed program and guidelines, my very first thought was that I’ll bet half those people aren’t even going to complete the exercises. The risk of a self-directed program is that you won’t do it if you don’t have any accountability built into the program.

Dr. Kenfield: Currently, we don’t know if supervised exercise will affect the outcome or not, and there is no evidence of superiority of one exercise strategy over another. Both groups are really important to the success of the trial. The information each participant provides will help investigators determine what levels of activities may be beneficial for men with advanced prostate cancer.

What kind of patients are you looking for?

Dr. Kenfield: We’re looking for men with metastatic prostate cancer whose disease has worsened on standard hormonal therapy. This is termed metastatic castrate-resistant disease. Patients are eligible if they’re receiving treatments in this disease phase, like Taxotere (docetaxel), Zytiga (abiraterone), Xtandi (enzalutamide), or they can be treatment naïve, meaning they’re not on these drugs yet. If a man has metastatic prostate cancer, the study coordinators will check the other study clinical criteria.

Men must be able to travel to one of the study-designated exercise facilities at least twice a week for nine months. That’s a requirement for someone who is randomized to the intervention arm. This tapers over time, but that’s a critical component of the study because we are trying to have men do supervised exercise with one of the exercise physiologists associated with the study.

Where are the study locations?

Dr. Kenfield: We have study locations in the USA, Canada, Australia, Europe, and we’re opening in China. Right now, we’re open at 12 sites; 10 other sites are in startup phase and 10 others are in feasibility stage. The study is continuing to grow, and we plan to have it continue at least through 2024.

That is a massive study.

Dr. Kenfield: I’m directing the study coordination center, based at UCSF. We have collaborators at Edith Cowan University; Dr. Nicholas Hart directs the exercise coordination center and manages the exercise testing and training for participants from Perth, Australia. At the study coordination center, we’re in charge of new site activations, patient recruitment, clinical data collection, the study databases, and data monitoring for every site, as well as the behavioral support and psycho-social support programs that are part of the study.

Pages from Prostatepedia_December2018

Do you have any thoughts for men with prostate cancer either about the INTERVAL study that you’re running or about diet, exercise, and lifestyle choices in general?

Dr. Kenfield: Please consider joining the INTERVAL study and contacting us if you are interested and think you may be eligible. We sincerely hope that men, regardless of arm assignment, will experience some benefit from participation. And finally, to summarize, a healthy diet, not smoking, and regular exercise are critical components to reduce your risk of developing lethal prostate cancer, and may possibly prevent or delay prostate cancer progression.

We’ve seen that adopting more of these behaviors could lead to greater benefits. As I mentioned before, many of these lifestyle factors are critical for reducing the risk of other chronic diseases like diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and heart disease. Death from cardiovascular disease is still the leading cause of death worldwide in men with prostate cancer, so it’s really important to consider making these changes, not just for your prostate cancer, but also for your overall health. It will impact a lot of other aspects of your life.

Does hormonal therapy exacerbate the cardiovascular disease that many men already have?

Dr. Kenfield: Yes, hormone therapy has been linked to increased risk of insulin resistance, an increase in body fat, and decreased muscle mass. Some of these metabolic changes could lead to increased risk in developing other health problems, like diabetes and heart disease. It’s really critical that men who are on ADT or hormone therapy are exercising to counteract some of these negative effects of the drugs.

Would you say that every man with prostate cancer should be exercising?

Dr. Kenfield: Yes, I would. Our studies have focused on men with prostate cancer adjusting for the treatments that they’re on.

Would you go as far as saying that every man—even if he does not have prostate cancer–and woman should be exercising?

Dr. Kenfield: Yes.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women, too, is it not?

Dr. Kenfield: Yes, it is. It’s helpful to have support. Have somebody in your life that encourages you to adopt these healthy behaviors, even if it’s just a colleague or a friend. I’d encourage everyone to find someone who can help motivate them to live healthier.

Not a member? Join us to read the rest of this month’s conversations about diet + lifestyle’s impact on prostate cancer.


Leave a comment

Obesity, Exercise + Prostate Cancer

Dr. Stephen Freedland is a urologist at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles, California and the Director of the Center for Integrated Research in Cancer and Lifestyle, Co-director of the Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program and Associate Director for Faculty Development at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute.

Dr. Freedland believes in treating the whole patient, and not just a man’s prostate cancer.

Prostatepedia spoke with him about the link between BMI, exercise, and prostate cancer.

Not a member? Join us.

Have you had any patients whose cases have changed how you view your role as a doctor or how you view the art of medicine?

Dr. Stephen Freedland: I think you go into medicine because you want to – at least for me – cure disease. That implies that there’s some state of perfect health. People come in to see me and they are not in a perfect state of health. You want to restore them to this perfect state of health. I now understand that there is no such thing as a perfect state of health. We perceive a perfect state of health to mean you have no diseases. However, you’re still at risk for certain diseases. Perfect implies you can’t do any better. I don’t think that’s the case. I think we can always do something better.

I changed from a physician whose goal was to cure disease to a life coach in many ways. I help move people from less healthy states to healthier states, but it’s not a black or white thing. I don’t cure disease and then go on to the next patient. I continue to work with them, hold their hand, be a counselor, a life coach, a shoulder to cry on, someone to slap a high five when they do have a success.

I had all those experiences yesterday in my clinic. A patient gave me a hug. He called me his angel, slapping high fives with another patient, and then one patient was practically in tears because he did not have such a good prognosis. To be able to ride the rollercoaster of life with patients is a phenomenal honor. It’s a lot of responsibility, but there is nowhere else in the world that I’d rather be.

That’s an interesting perspective. It’s more like seeing people when they’re healthy to help address diseases and issues as they come up rather than having people only come to you when they’re sick…

Dr. Freedland: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

That’s a nice segue into my first question: what do we know now about the role of BMI, exercise, and prostate cancer risk?

Dr. Freedland: BMI has been much better studied. It is very clearly delineated that elevated BMI increases the risk of aggressive prostate cancer and increases the risk of dying of prostate cancer. That’s pretty incontrovertible at this point. You’ll see a study here and there that says the opposite, but the totality of the data is pretty convincing in that regard.

Exercise is a little harder to study because you can’t simply measure it the way you can measure someone’s height and weight and know what their BMI is. You need to ask them how much they exercise. Is it vigorous exercise? Is it nonvigorous? Are you doing an hour at a time? You can get 1,000 or 10,000 steps during the day, or you can go run on the treadmill and get 10,000 steps in a half hour. It’s very different.

Collectively, I would say the data seem to suggest exercise and particularly vigorous exercise may be beneficial to prostate cancer risk, but again, that is not nearly as codified nor as consistent and clear as the link we see between BMI and bad prostate cancer.

What impact does BMI or exercise have on risk of prostate cancer progression?

Dr. Freedland: Elevated BMI increases the risk of progression, recurrence, spread to metastatic disease, and death of prostate cancer whereas exercise, again, particularly vigorous exercise, seems to be preventive for progression. But, again, this is not as well studied and is based on a handful of exercise studies. The role of BMI is pretty well established.

A lot of men on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) struggle with weight gain and muscle loss. What are the implications of this relationship between BMI and aggressive prostate cancer or exercise and aggressive prostate cancer for those men?

Dr. Freedland: As you said, ADT induces weight gain. You get muscle loss. There’s one study from our group that showed obesity at the time of ADT increases the risk of progression to castrate resistant disease. Surprisingly, it’s not been well studied. Let’s say you decide to go on a diet and not gain that ADT weight. We’ve actually shown a low-carbohydrate diet induces 25 pounds of weight loss despite being on ADT, so the weight gain is preventable. We do know that.

What we don’t know is impact of that weight gain on progression. Is gaining all that fat mass and losing muscle bad for your cancer? Intuitively, it should be. I mean, that just stands to reason from almost everything we know about prostate cancer and metabolism, but we haven’t proven it. We have not proven that if you can prevent those things, you can prevent or delay prostate cancer progression.

It certainly has an impact on cardiovascular disease, doesn’t it?

Dr. Freedland: Presumably but, again, it has not been studied in men on ADT. We do know exercise can preserve muscle function and quality of life. We know its impact on cardiovascular markers, but actually showing that exercise prevents cardiovascular disease in men on ADT has not been shown.

What we do know is that ADT will increase the risk of diabetes by about 40%. There’s data to suggest it may increase cardiovascular disease, but it’s controversial in that, if you look at really well done Phase III trials where men either got hormones or didn’t, you see no difference in cardiovascular deaths. Those are men on Phase III trials, selected to be healthy, and followed closely by their doctors. I think what we can say is, in highly selected patients, hormones are probably safe if you follow the patient closely, but in unselected patients, they probably do have cardiovascular effects.

That’s interesting what you just said: followed closely. Are you saying that people who are on clinical trials are just by nature of being in a clinical trial followed more closely than people who are not?

Dr. Freedland: Absolutely, I mean, there’s actually data to suggest that patients on clinical trials who are randomized to the control arm, i.e. standard of care, do better than patients not on the clinical trial who got the exact same treatment. Being on a trial, even if you don’t get that fancy experimental drug, still has benefits.

What does all this mean for patients? Should BMI be a priority for all men, including men who have prostate cancer?

Dr. Freedland: Correct. BMI is the strongest lifestyle link with prostate cancer. I see patients all the time ask me what should they eat. Should they take this supplement? Should they do that? Should they take this herb?

I say: just lose weight. That’s the one thing that we know. To me, it makes the most sense to focus on getting people to lose weight. How to lose weight is a challenge. Everybody has a difference of opinion. Part of it is picking a lifestyle and sticking with it. The word diet literally means way of life. The word is Greek in origin. We need to pick a way of life that’s sustainable, that’s going to work for you, and is going to help you to lose weight. The one common thread I see among all of the diets to a certain degree is reducing simple sugars—cookies, cakes, candies. There is not a diet that I’m aware of out there that says, “Nah, don’t worry about it. Eat all the cookies you want.”

You mean there is no chocolate cake diet?

Dr. Freedland: Correct. The low-fat, the whole-food plant-based folks will say eat all the vegetables you want. The low carb people will say eat all the meat you want. But all of them agree, even though they’re almost diametrically opposite, that cookies aren’t good.

What would you say about exercise? Would you tell men to prioritize BMI over exercise?

Dr. Freedland: To me, they go together. Do you know what the number one cause of death in men is?

Cardiovascular disease.

Dr. Freedland: Cardiovascular disease. What’s the number one cause of death in men with prostate cancer?

Cardiovascular disease.

Dr. Freedland: Cardiovascular disease. To me, if I can use a man’s cancer to scare him into eating right, losing weight, and exercising, I’ve probably done him a lot of good. Whether I’ve helped the cancer or not, in my mind, isn’t as important. Even if the exercise won’t help his prostate cancer, I’ve definitely done good from a cardiovascular point of view. To me, eating right and exercising go hand in hand. I don’t think you can focus on one over the other. Are you going to wear your pants today or are you going to wear a shirt? You need both, right? You’d look silly going around the workday without either one of those.

I guess it’s hard to lose weight without exercising.

Dr. Freedland: Amazingly, it’s not that hard to lose weight without exercising. Exercise is not a great way to lose weight. It’s a great way to get fit. It’s a great way to get healthy. Not a great way to lose weight. Not that it makes weight loss worse, but it actually doesn’t help weight loss much. Weight loss ultimately is about eating less.

Right, eating less than you spend, right?

Dr. Freedland: Correct, taking in less than you burn, and that’s where the whole-food plant-based diet comes in. You’re eating a lot of filling food that’s not calorie dense. It fills up your stomach and you feel full, even though you haven’t taken in a lot of calories.

You can also go to low-carb, which is very calorically dense. Fat and protein fill you up more than carbs, so you end up losing weight. There’s a lot of different ways to go about losing weight. There are general low fat diets. There’s Weight Watchers. There’s a lot of ways to lose weight. But exercise is something you do for your health, not to lose weight. The problem is that a lot of people start exercising to lose weight and then get frustrated and give up. You don’t exercise to lose weight. You exercise to get healthy. You eat less to lose weight.

Do you think discussions about BMI and exercise should be a part of every prostate cancer patient’s initial meeting with a doctor, whether he has low-risk or aggressive cancer?

Dr. Freedland: I think it should be a discussion with every patient at every visit regardless of the diagnosis. It should be part of a wellness visit, a hypertension visit, a high cholesterol or a BPH visit, or a prostate cancer visit. I think it needs to be integral. We need to not think of ourselves as prostate cancer doctors, or bladder cancer doctors, or whatever the case may be. We need to think of ourselves as doctors.

Most patients have more than one disease anyway. If you treat just the prostate cancer, then you’re ignoring the cardiovascular disease.

Dr. Freedland: Correct. It doesn’t mean we need to manage the cardiovascular disease and manage the blood pressure, but we need to be aware of it. We all went to medical school. But there’s more to a patient than his PSA and Gleason score.

Any final advice for men about obesity and prostate cancer?

Dr. Freedland: I always keep in mind the age-old adage: genes load the gun, but lifestyle pulls the trigger.

Join us to read the rest of this month’s conversations about diet, lifestyle, and prostate cancer.


Leave a comment

Diet, Exercise + Prostate Cancer

Pp_Dec_2018_V4_N4_Thumb

This month, Prostatepedia talks about things you can do to help yourself—diet and exercise.

Dr. Snuffy Myers frames this month’s conversations for us:

There is a clear consensus that it is a good idea to get thin and exercise. First, it is good for your general health as it reduces the risk of hypertension and diabetes as well as the cardiovascular complications associated with both of these diseases. Exercise has also been shown to preserve cognitive function and is beneficial for common neurologic diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

Second, exercise helps minimize the side effects of most of the treatments used for prostate cancer. Finally, as several interviewees discuss, exercise is associated with a lower risk of death from prostate cancer.

In my experience, it is not difficult to convince prostate cancer patients that they should exercise. However, it is very difficult for patients to initiate and maintain an exercise program that is comprehensive and vigorous on their own. It turns out that it is very important to join an exercise facility and get professional guidance. Ideally, you would have a personal trainer tailor your program to your abilities and needs. However, this can be expensive. A sound alternative is to attend group exercise sessions. Water aerobics classes are very gentle on knee and hip joints and practical for even very obese patients. Spin or indoor cycling sessions can offer a very intense cardiovascular workout with less risk of knee or hip trauma than running. Resistance exercise is important and, done properly, weight lifting has a relatively low risk of injury. However, most patients do not know how to squat or deadlift properly, so professional supervision is again important.

In his conversation, Dr. Stephen Freedland states that successful weight loss requires a diet that the patient can stick with long term. I would add that a diet is more likely to be successful if you believe in it yourself. In other words, there is a strong placebo effect.

This is not to say that anything goes. A diet based on cured meats, cookies, and cinnamon buns would not be healthy and would not promote weight loss. Some low carb diets do end up including cured meats like bacon.

In my clinic, we ended up recommending a Mediterranean diet as most patients found that easy to maintain over a period of years. The major pitfall was that some patients overate foods like pasta, leading to overly high carbohydrate intake. As a result, we emphasized moderate carbohydrate intake.

Charles E. Myers, Jr., MD